TribLIVEs Daily and Weekly e-mail newsletters provide the news you want and information you require, best to your inbox.
Its the same workout with Haskins. They are just bringing in another stopped working first-round quarterback with athletic advantage and arm talent to see if they can find what his first string did not.
And if they dont, its simply as simple to quietly enable Haskins to vanish on his 1 year futures contract as it was to eliminate Lynch. I mean, I saw Lynchs departure even less than I discovered his arrival. Didnt you?
Optimists about the relocation can call it low danger, high benefit. One teams castoff is another teams treasure.
Possibly. I call it low danger, low reward.
In an absolute best-case situation, perhaps Haskins shows to be a much better backup than Mason Rudolph. Even though their numbers up until now in the NFL do not recommend that.
Rudolph has actually played in 15 video games. Haskins in 16. Rudolph has more touchdowns, a much better passer rating, fewer interceptions, a better conclusion percentage and less sacks than Haskins.
Plus, you have to consider why Washington got rid of a former first-round draft choice QB in just two years. Like breaching covid-19 procedures by failing to use a mask while partying after a video game throughout the 2020 season. He was likewise supposedly benched for bad practice routines and preparation.
Do the Steelers want that guy in their quarterback space throughout Roethlisbergers last year?
Yeah. I dont believe so either.
I d dislike to see the Steelers pass on a potentially better choice if they think one is readily available in free firm or the middle rounds of the draft simply because they have Haskins in the mix now. Quarterback isnt like the majority of the other positions. You cant just put together as lots of as you desire and let them battle it out for playing time and spots on the depth chart.
At least not now with Roethlisberger still under agreement.
Just hoard a batch of quarterbacks together so no one else can get them for the time being. Give yourself as much of a choice for a succession plan as possible after Roethlisbergers agreement ends at the end of 2021.
Like when the Steelers added Tommy Maddox to the mix in 2001 with Kordell Stewart and Tee Martin. By early 2002, Maddox was beginning.
Or whatever the franchise was attempting to do in the 1980s with whatever mix they had in a given year of Cliff Stoudt, Mark Malone, David Woodley, Bubby Brister, Scott Campbell, Todd Blackledge, Rick Strom and Steve Bono.
Woof! Thats rather a list. Perhaps Lynch or Haskins wouldve took a crack at to emerge as a starter from that group.
To me, thats the most glaring indicator. Not so much that the Haskins signing is going to impact the Steelers in 2021. However starting in 2022, we may see the franchise wandering down that 1980s course of constantly throwing up a hodgepodge of quarterback mediocrity till they stumble onto the next capable full-time starter.
My hunch is Haskins function in Steelers history will be every bit of a footnote as the majority of the names in that lot. And trying to check out the tea leaves for some much deeper effect of this signing is an unproductive endeavor.
Due to the fact that Haskins is here, lets just hope the Steelers dont pass on someone who ends up being another teams treasure just.
You know, like in 1983 when they felt excellent enough about having Stoudt and Malone behind the aging and surgically repaired Terry Bradshaw. In the draft, they took Gabe Rivera rather of Dan Mari … Never mind.
TribLIVEs Daily and Weekly e-mail newsletters deliver the news you want and details you require, best to your inbox.
There is a lot of speculation over what the finalizing of previous Washington quarterback Dwayne Haskins “actually” suggests for the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Is it a sign that Ben Roethlisberger is going to retire? Is Haskins being employed to goose Roethlisberger in that direction? Does it indicate that Mason Rudolph is going to be traded or cut?
My guess is none of the above. In my view, this is nothing more than Paxton Lynch 2.0. Which is an unusual thing for me to type given that its difficult to even acknowledge that Paxton Lynch in fact ever existed as a Steeler in the first place.
He did. Trust me. I saw him on the practice fields.
Sports|Steelers/NFL|Breakfast With Benz
Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.
More Steelers/NFL Stories
And if they do not, its simply as easy to quietly allow Haskins to disappear on his one-year futures contract as it was to get rid of Lynch. Rudolph has more touchdowns, a better passer score, fewer interceptions, a better conclusion portion and fewer sacks than Haskins.
I d hate to see the Steelers pass on a possibly better alternative if they think one is available in free company or the middle rounds of the draft just because they have Haskins in the mix now. Possibly Lynch or Haskins wouldve had a shot to emerge as a starter from that group.
Not so much that the Haskins signing is going to impact the Steelers in 2021.